
QSBS Eligibility for Cross-Border Founders: The $10M Capital Gains Exclusion
PremiumSection 1202 allows up to $10M in capital gains exclusion on qualified small business stock. For cross-border founders, the eligibility requirements interact with entity structure, residency, and holding period in ways that are not immediately visible.
Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code — Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) — provides an exclusion of up to $10 million (or 10 times the adjusted basis, whichever is greater) in capital gains on the sale of qualifying stock. For founders who hold C-Corporation stock for more than five years and satisfy the statutory requirements, the tax savings on an exit event can be substantial. On a $5 million gain, the exclusion can eliminate approximately $1.19 million in federal capital gains tax at the current 23.8% rate (20% long-term capital gains plus 3.8% net investment income tax).
For domestic founders operating a single-jurisdiction business, the eligibility analysis is relatively straightforward. For cross-border founders, the picture changes. The interaction between QSBS eligibility, entity structure, tax residency, treaty provisions, expatriation rules, and state conformity creates an environment where each requirement carries additional variables. A founder who incorporates a Delaware C-Corp while residing in Singapore, or who moves from California to Portugal during the holding period, faces a different eligibility matrix than the domestic case assumes.
This article maps the QSBS eligibility requirements, identifies where cross-border structures introduce complexity, and presents a checklist framework for evaluating whether the exclusion applies to a given founder's situation.
Related Guide
Entity Structure & Formation — 10 articlesRelated Articles
Transfer Pricing for One-Person Companies: What Solo Founders Need to Document
When you are both the parent and the subsidiary, transfer pricing rules still apply. A structural guide to documenting intercompany transactions as a solo cross-border operator.
The Complete Entity Decision Framework for Cross-Border Founders
A structural decision tree mapping citizenship, tax residency, revenue source, and growth trajectory to entity type. Not advice — a framework for seeing which structural options exist.
Deel vs Oyster vs Remote: EOR Comparison for Solo Founders (2026)
Compare Deel, Oyster, and Remote EOR pricing, compliance coverage, and entity models for cross-border solo founders hiring their first employee abroad in 2026.
Do You Actually Need a US LLC? A Decision Framework for Non-Residents (2026)
Not every cross-border founder needs a US LLC. This decision framework maps when a US entity creates structural value, when it creates unnecessary complexity, and what alternatives exist for non-resident founders.
Wise vs Payoneer vs Mercury: Which Account Do Cross-Border Founders Actually Need? (2026)
A structural comparison of Wise Business, Payoneer, and Mercury for founders who receive income in one currency, pay expenses in another, and live in a third country. Fees, multi-currency capability, and the compliance implications of each.
Global Solo
Structural risk diagnostics for solo founders operating across borders. Built by practitioners who've navigated the complexity firsthand.
About the team →Map your structural profile
18 questions. 4 dimensions. A clear picture of what your structure actually is.
Start AssessmentStructural Patterns
One blind spot, every two weeks. For solo founders operating across borders.