Mercury vs Wise vs Relay: Best Bank for Cross-Border Solo Founders (2026)

Your bank choice is a structural decision. It determines which currencies you can receive natively, which jurisdictions your funds flow through, what compliance documentation you generate, and what happens to your cash flow if the banking relationship is disrupted.

For cross-border solo founders — operating a US LLC from outside the US, receiving revenue from clients in multiple countries, managing expenses in a currency that differs from their revenue currency — the choice between Mercury, Wise Business, and Relay is not primarily a feature comparison. It is a structural choice about how money moves through your entity and what that movement looks like to banks, payment processors, and tax authorities.

This article maps the structural characteristics of each option, the account opening process for non-residents, and the compliance implications that follow from the choice.

Who needs what: mapping the structural requirement

Before comparing features, the relevant question is what structural problem the banking arrangement needs to solve. Different cross-border situations create different banking requirements.

Domestic-only operations. A founder whose clients are primarily US-based, whose revenue arrives in USD, and whose expenses are denominated in USD needs a straightforward US business bank account. The structural complexity is low. Mercury or Relay both serve this pattern well.

Multi-currency operations. A founder who receives revenue in USD but pays contractors in EUR, lives in a country where expenses are in THB or MXN, or invoices European clients in EUR needs multi-currency capability. Converting currencies through a single-currency account incurs conversion fees on every transaction. Wise Business is structurally suited to this pattern.

International transfer-heavy operations. A founder who regularly moves money between jurisdictions — from a US account to a personal account in another country, from client payments in one currency to vendor payments in another — needs a banking arrangement that handles international transfers efficiently. Wire transfers through traditional bank rails are slow and expensive. Wise's native multi-currency infrastructure reduces this friction structurally.

Redundancy-conscious operations. A founder who recognizes that a single banking rail is a structural vulnerability — regardless of how well it functions today — needs accounts at multiple institutions. This is not a feature comparison; it is a structural decision about resilience.

The pattern: the "best bank" question has no universal answer. It depends on which structural characteristics matter for the specific cross-border arrangement. A founder whose situation maps to one pattern may find that a different pattern emerges as the business evolves.

Feature comparison: Mercury vs Wise Business vs Relay

| Feature | Mercury | Wise Business | Relay | |---|---|---|---| | Type | Banking platform (via partner banks) | Electronic money institution | Banking platform (via partner banks) | | FDIC insured | Yes (up to $5M via sweep) | No (safeguarded funds) | Yes (up to $250K per bank, multi-bank sweep available) | | Account types | Checking, savings, Treasury | Multi-currency account | Checking, savings | | Currencies | USD only | 50+ currencies | USD only | | Local bank details | US only | US, UK, EU, AU, CA, and others | US only | | International transfers | Wire transfer ($5 domestic, fees vary international) | Native multi-currency (mid-market rate + small fee) | Wire transfer (fees apply) | | Currency conversion | Via wire (bank conversion rates) | Mid-market rate + 0.33-1.5% fee | Via wire (bank conversion rates) | | Interest on deposits | Yes (Mercury Treasury, variable rate) | Yes (select currencies) | No | | Debit card | Yes (virtual and physical) | Yes (virtual and physical) | Yes (virtual and physical) | | Team access | Yes (roles and permissions) | Yes (multi-user) | Yes (roles, profit-first categories) | | Accounting integrations | QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite | QuickBooks, Xero (limited) | QuickBooks, Xero, FreshBooks | | API access | Yes (robust) | Yes | Yes | | Monthly fee | $0 | $0 (pay per transfer/conversion) | $0 | | Minimum balance | $0 | $0 | $0 |

Mercury has established itself as the default banking choice for US startups and solo founders. The product is designed for US-entity-based businesses, with a clean interface, robust integrations, and Mercury Treasury for earning yield on idle cash. For founders operating primarily in USD, Mercury provides a complete banking experience. The limitation for cross-border founders is that Mercury operates exclusively in USD — any multi-currency need requires a separate solution or expensive wire transfers.

Wise Business operates on fundamentally different infrastructure. It is not a bank in the traditional sense — it is an electronic money institution regulated in multiple jurisdictions. Funds held in Wise are safeguarded (held in ring-fenced accounts at partner banks) rather than insured by FDIC. What Wise provides that Mercury and Relay do not is native multi-currency capability: the ability to hold, receive, and send money in over 50 currencies at the mid-market exchange rate plus a transparent fee. For a founder who receives USD from US clients, pays a contractor in EUR, and transfers living expenses in THB, Wise reduces currency conversion from a series of expensive wire transfers to a single-platform operation.

Relay is positioned for small business banking with a focus on cash management. Its distinguishing feature is profit-first banking — the ability to create multiple accounts for different purposes (operating expenses, taxes, profit, owner's pay) within a single relationship. For solo founders who want structured cash allocation, Relay provides built-in categorization. For cross-border founders, Relay has the same USD-only limitation as Mercury but with fewer advanced features.

Account opening for non-residents

The account opening process differs meaningfully across the three platforms. For non-resident founders, the relevant question is not just whether an account can be opened remotely but what documentation and entity structure are required.

Mercury

Mercury requires a US-registered business entity (LLC or Corporation) and an EIN. The application is online and does not require a US physical presence. Documentation generally includes:

• Articles of Organization / Certificate of Formation
• EIN confirmation letter (CP 575 or equivalent)
• Government-issued photo ID for the beneficial owner
• Business description and expected activity

Mercury has been increasing scrutiny on non-resident applications. Some founders report additional documentation requests, extended review periods, or rejection for newly formed entities with no revenue history. The approval process is not guaranteed, and Mercury does not publicly disclose its specific criteria for non-resident accounts.

The structural characteristic: Mercury's compliance review evaluates the entity, the beneficial owner, and the declared business purpose against their internal risk model. A well-documented application with a clear business purpose has a higher probability of approval, but the outcome is not deterministic.

Wise Business

Wise accepts businesses registered in multiple jurisdictions — not only US entities. A founder with an Estonian OU, a UK Ltd, or a US LLC can open a Wise Business account. The documentation requirements vary by entity jurisdiction but generally include:

• Entity registration documents
• Proof of business address
• Government-issued ID for the beneficial owner
• Information about business activity and expected transaction patterns

Wise's multi-entity support makes it structurally different from Mercury and Relay. A founder who operates entities in multiple jurisdictions can manage them within the same Wise ecosystem. The account opening process tends to be faster than Mercury for non-residents, though Wise occasionally requests additional documentation for specific jurisdictions.

The structural characteristic: Wise is not a bank and funds are not FDIC insured. For founders who need FDIC protection — or whose business requires a traditional bank relationship for loan access, credit lines, or partner requirements — Wise serves a different structural function than Mercury or Relay.

Relay

Relay requires a US-registered LLC or Corporation with an EIN. The application process is similar to Mercury's, though Relay is less commonly used by non-resident founders and has less documentation about its non-resident application process.

The structural characteristic: Relay's profit-first banking model is its primary differentiator. For non-resident founders whose primary need is multi-currency or international transfer capability, Relay does not address those structural requirements.

The structural risk angle: why your bank choice has compliance implications

Banking is not just a feature set. The bank account creates a financial record that tax authorities, compliance reviewers, and future banking partners will reference. The structural implications of the banking choice extend beyond the account itself.

Jurisdiction alignment. The relationship between where the entity is registered, where the bank account is located, and where the founder is tax resident creates a jurisdictional map. When all three align, the arrangement is straightforward to document and explain. When they diverge — a Wyoming LLC, a US bank account, and a founder who is tax resident in Spain — the arrangement is legitimate but structurally more complex. The documentation burden increases with each jurisdictional divergence.

Transaction pattern as evidence. Banking records create a documented pattern of how money flows through the entity. For tax authorities, these records are evidence of where economic activity occurs, how income is classified, and whether the entity's declared purpose matches its actual operations. A bank account that shows primarily international transfers to the founder's personal account in another country tells a specific story about the entity's operations — a story that tax authorities in multiple jurisdictions may interpret differently.

Currency conversion as a compliance event. Every currency conversion creates a record with a specific exchange rate, amount, and timing. For founders who report income in one currency and receive it in another, the conversion rate used for tax reporting has to be documented and consistent. Wise's mid-market rate with a transparent fee creates cleaner documentation than a bank wire conversion where the rate is embedded and opaque.

Banking disruption as structural risk. If a banking relationship is disrupted — through a compliance review, account restriction, or closure — the consequences cascade. Payment processors linked to the account may be affected. Tax filings that reference the account create inconsistencies. The next banking partner will ask about the disruption. For non-resident founders with a single banking rail, disruption affects the entire operation.

For a deeper examination of these patterns, see Non-Resident Banking: Structural Fragility You Can't See from the Dashboard and The Banking Stability Illusion.

When multiple accounts make structural sense

The question of whether to maintain one bank account or multiple accounts is not a convenience decision. It is a structural decision about resilience, currency management, and jurisdictional alignment.

Redundancy. A single banking rail — regardless of how reliable it has been — is a structural dependency. If that rail is disrupted, the entire cash flow stops. Maintaining a second account at a different institution provides a fallback that does not require emergency setup during a crisis. The cost of maintaining a second account ($0 at Mercury, Wise, and Relay as of 2026) is trivially low compared to the cost of having no banking access for days or weeks during a disruption.

Currency separation. For founders who receive revenue in USD but incur expenses in other currencies, maintaining separate accounts for different currency functions can simplify both operations and documentation. A Mercury account for USD revenue collection and Stripe integration, paired with a Wise account for international transfers and multi-currency expenses, creates a cleaner structural arrangement than routing everything through a single USD account with expensive wire conversions.

Jurisdictional alignment. In some cases, having a bank account in the same jurisdiction as the founder's tax residency — in addition to the US entity's bank account — simplifies local tax compliance. Personal living expenses paid from a local account, with documented transfers from the US entity account, create a clearer paper trail than commingling entity and personal transactions in a single account.

The dual-account pattern. The most common structural arrangement among cross-border solo founders is Mercury (or Relay) for US entity banking plus Wise for multi-currency operations and international transfers. This combination addresses USD revenue collection, multi-currency needs, and provides banking redundancy — each at a different institution with different infrastructure and different risk models.

The structural observation: the question is not which bank is best. It is which combination of banking relationships creates the structural arrangement that matches the founder's actual cross-border operations — and provides resilience against disruption in any single relationship.

What this means for your structure

A bank account is not a neutral container for money. It is a node in a structural arrangement that connects the entity, the founder, the jurisdictions involved, and the documentation that describes the relationship between them.

Mercury provides the most complete US business banking experience for founders who operate primarily in USD. Wise provides the most flexible multi-currency infrastructure for founders whose operations cross currency boundaries. Relay provides structured cash management for founders who need operational categorization within a US banking relationship.

None of them address the structural questions that sit underneath the banking choice: whether the jurisdictional arrangement is documented, whether the transaction patterns align with the declared business purpose, whether the banking structure is resilient to disruption, and whether the documentation generated by the banking activity supports the founder's position across all relevant jurisdictions.

The banking choice creates the financial record that everything else references. The record is being created continuously, whether it is being examined or not. Structural awareness of what the banking arrangement implies — not just what it provides — is the distinction between a founder who has a bank account and a founder who has a banking structure.

---

Visual: Banking Decision Tree for Cross-Border Founders

Key Takeaways

• Mercury, Wise Business, and Relay serve different structural functions: Mercury and Relay provide FDIC-insured US business banking in USD only, while Wise provides non-FDIC multi-currency infrastructure across 50+ currencies at mid-market rates.
• Account opening for non-residents varies significantly: Mercury and Relay require a US entity and have increasing scrutiny on non-resident applications; Wise accepts entities from multiple jurisdictions with a generally faster approval process.
• The banking choice creates compliance implications beyond features: jurisdiction alignment between entity, bank, and founder residency determines documentation complexity, and transaction patterns create a permanent record that tax authorities reference.
• A single banking rail — regardless of reliability — is a structural dependency; maintaining accounts at multiple institutions (commonly Mercury + Wise) provides redundancy at zero marginal cost while addressing both USD and multi-currency needs.
• The distinction between having a bank account and having a banking structure lies in whether the jurisdictional arrangement is documented, whether transaction patterns align with declared business purpose, and whether the arrangement is resilient to disruption in any single relationship.

References

• Mercury: Banking for Startups — Mercury business banking features, Treasury, and account opening requirements
• Wise Business Account — Wise Business multi-currency account features, fees, and supported currencies
• Relay Financial: Business Banking — Relay business banking features, profit-first accounts, and integrations
• FinCEN: Bank Secrecy Act — US financial reporting requirements applicable to business bank accounts

Check your risk profile →